The Eastern Bible and Western Bible hold things in common: | |
| |
Differences between the two sets of Scriptures are: | |
|
| |
Eastern Bible consists of the following books: | |
|
| |
Acts of Yesu the Saviour | |
|
| |
Mystical Sayings of Yesu | |
|
| |
Acts of Thomas the Twin | |
|
| |
Book of Thomas | |
|
| |
Bhagavad Gita | |
|
| |
Tao Teh Ching ( Dao De Jing ) | |
|
| |
Book of Wisdom | |
|
| |
Song of Songs | |
|
| |
Final Words | |
|
The Eastern Bible is not history in the sense that it provides for dates and places where something happened—but it is the history of Church of the East in the sense that it tells a subtle story weaving through all the books; the story of the One Truth, the universal quest for that Truth, and the underlying peace, beauty, harmony, simplicity, humility and compassion in all things real and lasting.
Over the ages many editors’ hands reworked Scripture. Every now and again a new political ruler comes along, favours a particular Scripture (or hates another and has it edited or destroyed) and sponsors editors to ‘correct’ things to improve it for the readers of the time and context. Older Scriptures almost always reflect the morals and ethics of the day and the days of future editors. Morals and Ethics are always in flux, forever changing and particular to geographic areas, tribal idiosyncrasies and religious backgrounds of the writers, rulers and editors. Any writing that purports to be the “Inerrant Word of God” must be seen as exactly that—the inerrant word of the God of the people who believe it. People have been creating Gods in their own image for as long as humankind has been on earth. To learn more about who this God of that people is, one can quickly glean from the conduct of the people of that God, and from the morals and ethics of the God’s words, the kind of a God it is that the people like. Consider the history of the people of that book, meet with them and notice how they think and live and you will know why they cannot worship the impersonal Absolute One, or our Father in Heaven, the omnibenevolent creature of utmost compassion, humility and simplicity who gives no rules, demands nothing, expects nothing, needs nothing, rewards not and punishes not, and who loves us unconditionally, patiently waiting for karma and reincarnation and His angels to help us make our way to Heaven. Sometimes it is rather obvious that the people need for themselves a God that is just a little better than humans (of that day), yet more powerful. Do not be perturbed if you find in their Scriptures that their God is mighty cruel, jealous and a warmonger; most of those books are old and speak to, and from the hearts of people many, many years ago when humans were less developed. The Abrahamic religions have a definite inkling to have a God to themselves, who likes them above all other creatures, who hates those who don’t worship Him, yes a Him, and who promises severe torture for all souls who did not pay homage to Him. The Daodejing, on the other hand speaks only of a Creator Being, a Principle that defies definition, a “type of God” whom we cannot fathom, cannot name, but we can see Its hand in the workings of creation. The Bhagavad Gita speaks of the One, Brahma, but not much because we know so little. It concentrates on the quest of humans in daily life, the metaphorical war of the human’s existential quest for spiritual development, and the love that spiritual beings, the gods (Krishna in this book), has for us and how they can lead us to Heaven by any one of several yogic paths. Buddhist Scriptures do not speak of the Ultimate One more than to acknowledge that IT exists, rather, they speak of our Father in Heaven and the quest for spiritual perfection and rebirth in the Pure Land. So why then do we read Scriptures of old? We can, and do, learn from an ant. We gain spiritual growth and insight from watching a cloud form for a brief moment, then disappear. Of course, we can, and do, learn from the spirituality of our ancestors. Chances are, we were those ancestors who wrote and revered those books. There is much to gain from beautiful Scripture…much to lose by adhering to terrible Scripture. | |